From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10199 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2009 22:18:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 10163 invoked by uid 48); 31 Jul 2009 22:18:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090731221828.10162.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jistone at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20090526212255.10204.jistone@redhat.com> References: <20090526212255.10204.jistone@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tapsets/10204] Place userspace markers in systemtap itself X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com 2009-07-31 22:18 ------- > (In reply to comment #8) > > > probe staprun.send_control_message = > > process("/usr/local/bin/staprun").mark("send__ctlmsg") { > > > > Isn't this probe really in stapio? > > The marker is in the send_request function, which is in > runtime/staprun/common.c, so I guess not :) Here "common" means shared by both stapio and staprun, so the mark should actually manifest in both. staprun's use of send_request is only for loading kernel module relocations; stapio's messages are more interesting IMO. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10204 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.