From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7699 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2009 16:25:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 7522 invoked by uid 48); 3 Sep 2009 16:25:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090903162515.7521.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mjw at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20090903122458.10595.mjw@redhat.com> References: <20090903122458.10595.mjw@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug uprobes/10595] uprobe probes causes selinux failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00538.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com 2009-09-03 16:25 ------- It isn't return probe specific like I first thought. With both normal and return probes there is this hint in /var/log/messages: kernel: Uprobes failed to allocate a vma for pid/tgid 17519/17519 for single-stepping out of line. The strange thing is that normal uprobes still seem to work, they trigger their handler as expected even though you get a selinux denial message, but return probes don't trigger. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|uprobe return probes causes |uprobe probes causes selinux |selinux failures |failures http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10595 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.