From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24955 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2009 17:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 24293 invoked by uid 48); 4 Sep 2009 17:25:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090904172539.24291.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mjw at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20090903122458.10595.mjw@redhat.com> References: <20090903122458.10595.mjw@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug uprobes/10595] uprobe probes causes selinux failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com 2009-09-04 17:25 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Created an attachment (id=4170) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4170&action=view) > > ssol-vma-selinux patch using shmem_file_setup > > At this point > if (addr & ~PAGE_MASK) { > addr will be undefined if shmem_file_setup() returned NULL. addr would be 0 if !file, since earlier in the function we have: if ((addr = find_old_ssol_vma()) != 0) return addr; > Yes, runtime/uprobes/uprobes.c and ubp_xol.c (?) in the ubp-based uprobes bits. > Thanks, mjw. Srikar, are you going to take it from here? I found fche's utrace-ext.git repo, is that where those are now? I can certainly build that and supply a patch for it. Which branch should it be against? utrace-uprobes or utrace-gdbstub-uprobes? Does that uprobes kernel module version work against systemtap git? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10595 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.