* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-09-07 8:24 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-09-07 8:48 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2009-09-07 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-09-07 08:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=4176)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4176&action=view)
simple patch to abort the test once compilation failed
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
2009-09-07 8:24 ` [Bug testsuite/10608] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
@ 2009-09-07 8:48 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2009-09-07 18:13 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2009-09-07 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com 2009-09-07 08:48 -------
I am not sure I like this much since it hides stuff (32-on-64 did - and does -
show issues).
Also there are other tests that depend on 32-on-64 testing. e.g. exelib.exp and
utrace_syscall_args.exp
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
2009-09-07 8:24 ` [Bug testsuite/10608] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-09-07 8:48 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2009-09-07 18:13 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-09-10 3:29 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-09-07 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-09-07 18:13 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am not sure I like this much since it hides stuff (32-on-64 did - and does -
> show issues).
The proposed patch skips the tests if the 32-bit build environment is missing.
Under those circumstances, we would not get meaningful systemtap results
(since the tests couldn't be linked/run), so we lose nothing.
> Also there are other tests that depend on 32-on-64 testing. e.g. exelib.exp and
> utrace_syscall_args.exp
Right, and those should get the same treatment.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-07 18:13 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-09-10 3:29 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-09-10 15:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2009-09-10 3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-09-10 03:29 -------
Created an attachment (id=4185)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4185&action=view)
Updated patch
Two parts are added.
1. Specify the detailed failed test information like 32/64-bit access
2. Do a little cleanup on utrace_syscall_args.exp with same treatment.
A piece of example output after it.
Testing 32-bit clock
Executing on host: gcc ./systemtap.syscall/clock.c -m32 -lm -o
/home/wjhuang/systemtap/testsuite/staptestz25682/clock (timeout = 300)
/usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s^M
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status^M
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s^M
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status^M
32-bit clock : no corresponding devel environment found
UNTESTED: 32-bit clock
NB: Leave exelib.exp alone since it has suchlike termination once the
compilation failed and operates on different way.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #4176 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-10 3:29 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
@ 2009-09-10 15:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-09-11 5:35 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-09-10 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-09-10 15:00 -------
How about putting all the dejagnu result calls (pass/fail/untested/etc.)
right into proc run_one_test{}, no longer returning magic strings for
result logging back in test_procedure{} ? That would simplify things.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-10 15:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-09-11 5:35 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-09-14 7:10 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-09-14 15:14 ` fche at redhat dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2009-09-11 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-09-11 05:35 -------
Created an attachment (id=4188)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4188&action=view)
patch v3
Put the logic things into proc run_one_test.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #4185 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-11 5:35 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
@ 2009-09-14 7:10 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-09-14 15:14 ` fche at redhat dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2009-09-14 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-09-14 07:10 -------
commit 38070723b06baf781ef18e2516e33e6bdbe18d8f
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/10608] don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available
2009-09-04 20:50 [Bug testsuite/10608] New: don't attempt 32-bit syscall tests if 32-bit devel environment not available fche at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-14 7:10 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
@ 2009-09-14 15:14 ` fche at redhat dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-09-14 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 15:14 -------
Thanks.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10608
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread