From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10391 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2009 12:26:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 9330 invoked by uid 48); 8 Sep 2009 12:26:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090908122636.9328.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20090903122458.10595.mjw@redhat.com> References: <20090903122458.10595.mjw@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug uprobes/10595] uprobe probes causes selinux failures X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00608.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-09-08 12:26 ------- > > Yes, runtime/uprobes/uprobes.c and ubp_xol.c (?) in the ubp-based uprobes bits. > > Thanks, mjw. Srikar, are you going to take it from here? > > I found fche's utrace-ext.git repo, is that where those are now? I can certainly > build that and supply a patch for it. Which branch should it be against? > utrace-uprobes or utrace-gdbstub-uprobes? Does that uprobes kernel module > version work against systemtap git? Yes, Its in utrace-ext.git repo. It should be against utrace-gdbstub-uprobe branch. Generally I send patches to utrace-devel and cc Frank and Frank picks the patch and applies it. However uprobes code in the git tree is a little different. That particular snippet of code has moved to kernel/ubp_xol.c. Do let me know if you want me to apply the patch and send it across. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10595 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.