From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18815 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2009 21:01:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17681 invoked by uid 48); 8 Sep 2009 21:00:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090908210042.17680.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "fche at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20090728133231.10454.mjw@redhat.com> References: <20090728133231.10454.mjw@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/10454] Raw number statement probes won't work without dwarf info X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00619.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-09-08 21:00 ------- The consensus appears to be that we should permit this situation, by one or both of these methods: (transcribing from irc): (a) fche does query_cu_containing_address(addr) return 0 (without throwing an exception) here? fche if so, we could change query_cu to accept a null cudie fche and have it perform the #if-0 PR5787 #endif block -- conditional on guru_mode (b) implementing the documented but nonexistent process(*).statement(NUM).absolute probe point -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10454 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.