public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	        systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	        DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	        Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	        Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	        "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	        Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] kprobes: prevent re-registration of the same kprobe - 	take2
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090915051307.GB26458@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AAE6E85.9020002@redhat.com>

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:25:41PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 09:47:39PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:12:54AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:53:30PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

...

>> +static inline int check_kprobe_rereg(struct kprobe *p)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	struct kprobe *old_p;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
>> +	old_p = __get_valid_kprobe(p);
>> +	if (old_p == p)
>
> Here, since __get_valid_kprobe(p) will return aggr_kprobe of 'p',
> you just need to check old_p != NULL.

Right!

---
Prevent re-registration of the same kprobe. This situation, though
unlikely, needs to be flagged since it can lead to a system crash if its
not handled.

The core change itself is small, but the helper routine needed to be
moved around a bit; hence the diffstat.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli<ananth@in.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.31/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux-2.6.31/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -681,6 +681,40 @@ static kprobe_opcode_t __kprobes *kprobe
 	return (kprobe_opcode_t *)(((char *)addr) + p->offset);
 }
 
+/* Check passed kprobe is valid and return kprobe in kprobe_table. */
+static struct kprobe * __kprobes __get_valid_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	struct kprobe *old_p, *list_p;
+
+	old_p = get_kprobe(p->addr);
+	if (unlikely(!old_p))
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (p != old_p) {
+		list_for_each_entry_rcu(list_p, &old_p->list, list)
+			if (list_p == p)
+			/* kprobe p is a valid probe */
+				goto valid;
+		return NULL;
+	}
+valid:
+	return old_p;
+}
+
+/* Return error if the kprobe is being re-registered */
+static inline int check_kprobe_rereg(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct kprobe *old_p;
+
+	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
+	old_p = __get_valid_kprobe(p);
+	if (old_p)
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -693,6 +727,10 @@ int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kpr
 		return -EINVAL;
 	p->addr = addr;
 
+	ret = check_kprobe_rereg(p);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	preempt_disable();
 	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
 	    in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
@@ -762,26 +800,6 @@ out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_kprobe);
 
-/* Check passed kprobe is valid and return kprobe in kprobe_table. */
-static struct kprobe * __kprobes __get_valid_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
-{
-	struct kprobe *old_p, *list_p;
-
-	old_p = get_kprobe(p->addr);
-	if (unlikely(!old_p))
-		return NULL;
-
-	if (p != old_p) {
-		list_for_each_entry_rcu(list_p, &old_p->list, list)
-			if (list_p == p)
-			/* kprobe p is a valid probe */
-				goto valid;
-		return NULL;
-	}
-valid:
-	return old_p;
-}
-
 /*
  * Unregister a kprobe without a scheduler synchronization.
  */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-15  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-10 23:51 [PATCH tracing/kprobes 0/7] tracing/kprobes: kprobe-based event tracer update and perf support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 3/7] tracing/kprobes: Cleanup kprobe tracer code Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11  2:33   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-11  2:36     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 4/7] tracing/kprobes: Add event profiling support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11  3:13   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 16:18     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14  3:02       ` Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]         ` <4AAE7540.9090009@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 18:55           ` Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]             ` <4AAE9B41.3020905@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 21:07               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-15  4:52                 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2009-09-11 19:26     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14  3:08       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-13 10:07     ` [BUGFIX] kprobes: prevent re-registration of the same kprobe Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
     [not found]       ` <4AADA0BB.4030307@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 10:05         ` [BUGFIX] kprobes: prevent re-registration of the same kprobe - take2 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
     [not found]           ` <4AAE6E85.9020002@redhat.com>
2009-09-15  5:19             ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2009-09-16 23:52               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 1/7] x86/ptrace: Fix regs_get_argument_nth() to add correct offset Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11  1:43   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 2/7] tracing/kprobes: Fix probe offset to be unsigned Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 5/7] tracing/kprobes: Add argument name support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 14:08   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-11 16:07     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 16:28       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:52 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 6/7] tracing/kprobes: Show event name in trace output Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:52 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 7/7] tracing/kprobes: Support custom subsystem for each kprobe event Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11  1:33 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 0/7] tracing/kprobes: kprobe-based event tracer update and perf support Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11  1:45   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-11 15:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14  3:00     ` Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]       ` <4AAE7A5D.8010503@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 20:53         ` Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]           ` <4AAEB149.2070300@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 21:09             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 19:03   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-09-11 19:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-11 19:51       ` Mark Wielaard
     [not found]         ` <20090911200317.GA3827@infradead.org>
2009-09-12  1:20           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 19:15     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 15:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 21:44   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14  2:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090915051307.GB26458@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).