From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-14010-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30978 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2009 00:02:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 29742 invoked by uid 48); 22 Oct 2009 00:02:37 -0000
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:02:00 -0000
From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <20091022000237.10825.fche@redhat.com>
Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug translator/10825] New: use openmp for parallelism
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2

Let's identify a few places where multithreading could yield benefits,
and try the modern gcc #pragma's for them.

Some obvious candidates are pass1 and pass2, the latter possibly
requiring elfutils facilities.

-- 
           Summary: use openmp for parallelism
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.