From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17927 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2009 16:56:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 17861 invoked by uid 48); 28 Oct 2009 16:56:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091028165620.17860.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "fche at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20091023162529.10836.fche@redhat.com> References: <20091023162529.10836.fche@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug uprobes/10836] uprobes-provided pt_regs* are unreliable X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00335.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-10-28 16:56 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > [...] For the registers that SystemTap actually references, would the pointer > provided by task_pt_regs() be sufficient? For sake of print_regs(), unwinding, or general dwarf-based (eg. fbreg-relative) $context variable access, it looks like utrace signal pt_regs == task_pt_regs == not accurate. So we do have a pervasive problem. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10836 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.