From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 532 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2009 23:50:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 487 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2009 23:50:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091029235026.486.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jistone at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080912135907.6880.fche@redhat.com> References: <20080912135907.6880.fche@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/6880] more syntax for shared library probing X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com 2009-10-29 23:50 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > This would resolve the exact library file via heuristics like ldd, > and constrain the uprobes to only named processes. > probe process("ls").library("libc").function/statement(...) { } I was recently reminded of the perils of ldd vs. a custom --dynamic-linker, so we should tread carefully here... -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6880 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.