From: "przemyslaw at pawelczyk dot it" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [Bug translator/10830] new pp() variant for source-level probe point name
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100623102223.8813.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091022162856.10830.fche@redhat.com>
------- Additional Comments From przemyslaw at pawelczyk dot it 2010-06-23 10:22 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> pp1() is pretty obscure.
Agree.
> What about pn() for probe-name (where pp() is for probe-point)?
Sound better than "pretty please" or "people", but can be misleading.
After all the name of the probe alias is returned here.
I suggest following renames:
pp() -> ppname()
ppl() -> paname()
and leaving pp() as (deprecated) alias for new name (backward compatibility or
maybe only via --compatible).
Yes, new names would be more verbose, but also more clean IMHO. What do you
think?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10830
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-23 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-22 16:29 [Bug translator/10830] New: " fche at redhat dot com
2009-10-22 17:58 ` [Bug translator/10830] " jistone at redhat dot com
2009-10-22 18:05 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-01-18 20:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-03-16 18:20 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-06-23 11:43 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-06-23 16:43 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2010-06-23 23:09 ` przemyslaw at pawelczyk dot it [this message]
2010-06-24 7:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-06-24 18:47 ` jistone at redhat dot com
[not found] <bug-10830-1110@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-25 18:19 ` fche at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100623102223.8813.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).