From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31696 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2010 11:43:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 31611 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jun 2010 11:42:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100623114256.31610.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "fche at redhat dot com" To: systemtap@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20091022162856.10830.fche@redhat.com> References: <20091022162856.10830.fche@redhat.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug translator/10830] new pp() variant for source-level probe point name X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-06-23 11:42 ------- I'm not too keen on verbosifying the function names, nor deprecating one of the most used tapset functions (pp()). One other possibility is to permit and use tapset function overloading: pp()==pp(0) pp1 to become pp(1). This would also be useful for PR11679. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.