* [Bug runtime/9911] New: Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226
@ 2009-02-27 17:03 mahesh at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2009-02-28 2:51 ` [Bug runtime/9911] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2010-08-12 17:47 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mahesh at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com @ 2009-02-27 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3860 bytes --]
[root@llm27lp1 linux-next]# /usr/local/bin/stap --vp 0001 --vp 0001 -e 'probe
syscall.* { print ("here\n") exit() }'
Running make -C "/lib/modules/2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226/build"
M="/tmp/stapOzhxl0" modules >/dev/null
In file included from
/tmp/stapOzhxl0/stap_427480df5645d5ef9e8919ec2e90e32e_93928.c:43:
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:33:28: error: asm/stacktrace.h: No
such file or directory
In file included from
/tmp/stapOzhxl0/stap_427480df5645d5ef9e8919ec2e90e32e_93928.c:43:
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:84: error: variable print_stack_ops
has initializer but incomplete type
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:85: error: unknown field warning
specified in initializer
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:85: warning: excess elements in
struct initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:85: warning: (near initialization for
print_stack_ops)
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:86: error: unknown field
warning_symbol specified in initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:86: warning: excess elements in
struct initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:86: warning: (near initialization for
print_stack_ops)
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:87: error: unknown field stack
specified in initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:87: warning: excess elements in
struct initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:87: warning: (near initialization for
print_stack_ops)
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:88: error: unknown field address
specified in initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:88: warning: excess elements in
struct initializer
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:88: warning: (near initialization for
print_stack_ops)
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c: In function _stp_stack_print_fallback:
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:97: error: implicit declaration of
function dump_trace
make[1]: *** [/tmp/stapOzhxl0/stap_427480df5645d5ef9e8919ec2e90e32e_93928.o] Error 1
make: *** [_module_/tmp/stapOzhxl0] Error 2
Pass 4: compiled C into "stap_427480df5645d5ef9e8919ec2e90e32e_93928.ko" in
3350usr/610sys/4645real ms.
Pass 4: compilation failed. Try again with another '--vp 0001' option.
Running rm -rf /tmp/stapOzhxl0
The linux-next git tree as of 20090226
[root@llm27lp1 linux-next]# git log | head
commit f5e8cca8e64476777c42f068eabf66ccc55c957b
Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu Feb 26 19:16:43 2009 +1100
Add linux-next specific files for 20090226
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
commit c8b27915751c6b102cd766855bbf45338e8e9470
Merge: a7cebc0... 5164c03...
[root@llm27lp1 linux-next]#
And the systemtap is git head is top of the tree:
[root@llm27lp1 systemtap]# git log | head
commit a8394af5f2db2bbb57414ffa4d4fc260e2aac3e9
Author: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 25 17:11:51 2009 +0100
Guard _struct_sigaction32_u with ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT.
* tapset/aux_syscalls.stp (_struct_sigaction_u): Only needed and compiles
when CONFIG_COMPAT defined.
commit bec508deffdb39affbd6e93a7ce1d2c92d653a12
[root@llm27lp1 systemtap]#
--
Summary: Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-
20090226
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: runtime
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: mahesh at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9911
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug runtime/9911] Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226
2009-02-27 17:03 [Bug runtime/9911] New: Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226 mahesh at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
@ 2009-02-28 2:51 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2010-08-12 17:47 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2009-02-28 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-02-28 02:04 -------
This bug is same as 9866. API changed a bit in 2.6.19/24, even the latest kernel.
Need to revamp the stack code to keep good compatibility.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9911
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug runtime/9911] Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226
2009-02-27 17:03 [Bug runtime/9911] New: Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226 mahesh at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2009-02-28 2:51 ` [Bug runtime/9911] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
@ 2010-08-12 17:47 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-08-12 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-12 17:47 -------
Several stack-related runtime/autoconf-* patches have been committed, no
currently known incompatible kernels.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9911
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-12 17:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-27 17:03 [Bug runtime/9911] New: Systemtap is broken with linux-next 2.6.29-rc6-next-20090226 mahesh at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
2009-02-28 2:51 ` [Bug runtime/9911] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2010-08-12 17:47 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).