* [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence
@ 2010-07-08 17:23 fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-08 18:25 ` [Bug testsuite/11798] " mjw at redhat dot com
2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-08 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
The testsuite can proceed quite a way without prerequisite debuginfo
stuff installed. Instead one just gets a bunch of FAILs farther down
the line.
It would be nice if the very first few test cases checked that some
basic stuff like probe kernel.function("sys_open") {} compiled,
and aborts the whole testsuite if not.
--
Summary: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo
presence
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/11798] early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence
2010-07-08 17:23 [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-07-08 18:25 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-08 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com 2010-07-08 18:24 -------
There are also lots of tests that don't need the kernel debuginfo but operate
purely in user space (and generate their own executables/libraries/debuginfo).
So won't it make sense to make the kernel debuginfo needing tests as UNTESTED in
an environment that doesn't have it?
Alternatively make installcheck could run stap-prep as first test.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/11798] early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence
2010-07-08 17:23 [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-08 18:25 ` [Bug testsuite/11798] " mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-08-16 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-08-16 19:09 -------
True, we have many tests that operate without kernel-debuginfo, but many
also do. So we'd have to annotate all the latter with a [kernel_debuginfo_p]
test, which is a little more work, just to have uprobes-only tests go.
commit 0371220
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-16 19:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-08 17:23 [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-08 18:25 ` [Bug testsuite/11798] " mjw at redhat dot com
2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).