public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence
@ 2010-07-08 17:23 fche at redhat dot com
  2010-07-08 18:25 ` [Bug testsuite/11798] " mjw at redhat dot com
  2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-08 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

The testsuite can proceed quite a way without prerequisite debuginfo
stuff installed.  Instead one just gets a bunch of FAILs farther down
the line.

It would be nice if the very first few test cases checked that some
basic stuff like   probe kernel.function("sys_open") {}  compiled,
and aborts the whole testsuite if not.

-- 
           Summary: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo
                    presence
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: testsuite
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11798

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/11798] early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence
  2010-07-08 17:23 [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-07-08 18:25 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-08 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2010-07-08 18:24 -------
There are also lots of tests that don't need the kernel debuginfo but operate
purely in user space (and generate their own executables/libraries/debuginfo).
So won't it make sense to make the kernel debuginfo needing tests as UNTESTED in
an environment that doesn't have it?

Alternatively make installcheck could run stap-prep as first test.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11798

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/11798] early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence
  2010-07-08 17:23 [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence fche at redhat dot com
  2010-07-08 18:25 ` [Bug testsuite/11798] " mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-08-16 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2010-08-16 19:09 -------
True, we have many tests that operate without kernel-debuginfo, but many
also do.  So we'd have to annotate all the latter with a [kernel_debuginfo_p]
test, which is a little more work, just to have uprobes-only tests go.

commit 0371220

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11798

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-16 19:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-08 17:23 [Bug testsuite/11798] New: early sanity check for testsuite to assert debuginfo presence fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-08 18:25 ` [Bug testsuite/11798] " mjw at redhat dot com
2010-08-16 19:09 ` fche at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).