From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
To: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Making the transport layer more robust
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110812174324.GA1394@hermans.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311065908.9144.27.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:58:28AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> I hope that after the next release I can cleanup the transport layer a
> bit more. In particular I think we should really get rid of the
> difference between _stp_ctl_send and _stp_ctl_write, which leads to
> needing an extra timer just to flush the messages from the queue (and
> check for the exit condition). If we can replace that logic with just a
> wait queue based trigger then the code could become a little simpler.
> The extra timer triggers made analyzing the above two bugs that much
> harder.
I finally did this:
commit 46ac9ed5bad86641e552bee4e42a2d973ffc12d0
Author: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Aug 12 19:34:20 2011 +0200
Remove _stp_ctl_work_timer from module transport layer.
The _stp_ctl_work_timer would trigger every 20ms to check whether
there were cmd messages queued, but not announced yet and to
check the _stp_exit_flag was set.
This commit makes all control messages announce themselves and
check the _stp_exit_flag in the _stp_ctl_read_cmd loop (delivery
is still possibly delayed since the messages are just pushed on
a wait queue).
Tested on f14, rhel5 and rhel4 without any regressions in make installcheck.
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 8:59 Mark Wielaard
2011-07-19 11:42 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-07-19 15:03 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-07-20 8:29 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-07-19 15:05 ` William Cohen
2011-07-20 14:13 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-07-21 17:18 ` David Smith
2011-08-12 17:43 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2011-08-15 8:24 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-08-15 18:30 ` Josh Stone
2011-08-16 13:23 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-08-25 12:12 ` Turgis, Frederic
2011-08-26 15:45 ` Turgis, Frederic
2011-08-26 18:45 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-29 8:32 ` Turgis, Frederic
2011-08-29 11:21 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-29 14:46 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-08-30 13:20 ` Turgis, Frederic
2011-09-05 11:27 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-09-05 14:32 ` Turgis, Frederic
[not found] ` <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F1460163182604@dnce02.ent.ti.com>
2011-09-06 10:12 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-09-06 14:30 ` Turgis, Frederic
2011-09-06 14:37 ` David Smith
2011-09-06 15:37 ` David Smith
2011-09-06 16:25 ` Turgis, Frederic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110812174324.GA1394@hermans.wildebeest.org \
--to=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).