From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20495 invoked by alias); 3 May 2012 08:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 20485 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2012 08:33:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2012 08:33:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q438XbdK011820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 May 2012 04:33:38 -0400 Received: from toonder.wildebeest.org (ovpn-116-46.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.46]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q438XalD017948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 May 2012 04:33:37 -0400 Received: by toonder.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 276902701B; Thu, 3 May 2012 10:33:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 08:33:00 -0000 From: Mark Wielaard To: "Turgis, Frederic" Cc: Josh Stone , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , "systemtap@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Tune reader_thread poll timeout value Message-ID: <20120503083335.GC6977@toonder.wildebeest.org> References: <28BE1A38672C8B4481BB423D0FD1F22E18F55BE1@DNCE04.ent.ti.com> <1335948371.24235.2.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> <28BE1A38672C8B4481BB423D0FD1F22E18F563C1@DNCE04.ent.ti.com> <4FA19BDD.60605@redhat.com> <28BE1A38672C8B4481BB423D0FD1F22E18F566F9@DNCE04.ent.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28BE1A38672C8B4481BB423D0FD1F22E18F566F9@DNCE04.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:14:58AM +0000, Turgis, Frederic wrote: > >That's an important point, that this tunable as you've implemented it is > >built into stapio, not into individual modules, so it's much more > >static. Maybe this would be better as a command-line option to > >staprun/stapio? (like the current -b buffer size) > > But if systemtap experts feel it is worth exposing it like -b option, > we will of course patch accordingly, this would be the most flexible > solution ! Yes, I think that would be the nicest solution. I had previously missed this was part of stapio and not of the module runtime. Thanks, Mark