From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Jon VanAlten <jvanalte@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com>,
systemtap@sourceware.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net,
Lukas Berk <lberk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030080304.GA12689@toonder.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299938704.3549181.1351561757214.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:49:17PM -0400, Jon VanAlten wrote:
> We reached the conclusion (I believe) that it would be best to
> wait and hear from Mark about plans referred to in email archive
> link below. Mark, do you have any comment here? Would it be
> for the best to revert here and apply instead to 7 forest?
Adding patches directly to the tree is fine with me.
My only hesitation was my own confusion since the default
configure/make setup doesn't pick up a patched forest.
You don't have that issue with patches, which are directly
applied. If we are going for a complete forest setup it
might make sense to also add the tapsets and testsuite
directly there.
I'll try and figure it all out again and also port the existing
patches to the forest. Hints and tips appreciated.
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-02 13:11 Lukas Berk
2012-08-03 13:56 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-08-03 14:23 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-07 11:50 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-08-08 14:01 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-08 14:34 ` Mario Torre
2012-08-08 20:37 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-08 21:11 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-08 22:05 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-22 20:34 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-24 19:59 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-28 21:23 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-29 11:52 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-08-30 1:19 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-31 20:07 ` Lukas Berk
2012-09-24 18:17 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-10-23 16:53 ` Lukas Berk
2012-10-25 5:02 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-10-25 13:09 ` Andrew Hughes
2012-10-30 1:49 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-10-30 8:03 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2012-10-30 12:37 ` Andrew Hughes
2012-11-01 18:33 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-11-01 19:06 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-11-01 22:12 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-11-02 14:54 ` Andrew Hughes
2012-11-02 15:03 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121030080304.GA12689@toonder.wildebeest.org \
--to=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net \
--cc=gnu.andrew@redhat.com \
--cc=jvanalte@redhat.com \
--cc=lberk@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).