From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31123 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2016 05:03:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31111 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2016 05:03:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-pf0-f172.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f172.google.com) (209.85.192.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 05:03:11 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y134so83812111pfg.0 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:03:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/xHRilcw6V9YUKMuEgvA6DiVl6zpODc0X/OnRNaTtDk=; b=PwAE6cEmOpmTanMALHPMQ8eBP7kMmOH9UMhOEHX+n2b4hCyV1ZYhQ22jqtRuNGnepw p3GztVEkS35TWgMSzsdjVURiMMA3TWAjUGpVQLCBDZ1iQglU10d6AAUAApQoblegOdAK 5b44A6tWchx/gbSf1e41Q5Y51D4xvBeOKUqrGS8XjNHpMRdlSvUwossKgTfC4lMLNoQt EqHvtjfH/JU2sTpKyPHhacfe5L8+RFwRlU/qYOGchusMdCulzYEnxCBAOmXATfWSBL6B LkQDbwt0DjIDTTwoV0K14JUDX38B3GzGdianmZkOaqWH5t9mGwh+QcCcR6xjfeG/n/if 3QWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuL6TPl8j3lN99fKTsSqOhpo+99Cl5PAU61uBZb1LrHNQdkLLUhFXwh5q2qvGPnL2WC X-Received: by 10.98.86.85 with SMTP id k82mr123890143pfb.82.1470286989976; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.180.189.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w76sm16281202pfd.69.2016.08.03.22.03.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 22:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 05:03:00 -0000 From: Pratyush Anand To: David Long Cc: William Cohen , systemtap@sourceware.org, Mark Brown , Jeremy Linton , David Smith , "Frank Ch. Eigler" Subject: Re: Lastest kprobes64 patch Message-ID: <20160804050307.GC22191@localhost.localdomain> References: <576C29E1.8060805@linaro.org> <0a594132-796b-779d-b473-a06c0f3e8ae8@redhat.com> <20160627141840.GB8139@dhcppc9> <577EA7EE.2070607@linaro.org> <20160803131302.GC18785@localhost.localdomain> <2947a749-a518-d560-f768-60cc2f2c691e@redhat.com> <57A24D61.6060802@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57A24D61.6060802@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-q3/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 Hi Dave, On 03/08/2016:04:00:33 PM, David Long wrote: > In repsonse to the prolonged discussion on issues with use of a duplicated > stack for jprobes on arm64 I have created the requested change of removing > the stack duplication code altogether. I don't know how this affects > systemtap. It would also be good to have a better idea of how much > systemtap makes use of jprobes. > > The new additional patch, plus Catalin's accumulated patches since > kprobes64-v15, are now in my (recreated) kprobes64-v16 branch. If someone > has time to exercise this it I would be grateful. Your all patches except "arm64: Remove stack duplicating code from jprobes" are already in torvalds/linux.git:master now. ~Pratyush