public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Cc: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
	systemtap@sourceware.org,	Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jlinton@redhat.com>,
	David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: exercising current aarch64 kprobe support with systemtap
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160818145517.GA15921@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb6bb817-64f7-0a50-5f20-7797fd84b822@redhat.com>

Hi Will,

On 17/08/2016:10:36:23 AM, William Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was able to locally build uptream_arm64-devel branch of  https://github.com/pratyushanand/linux.git with the configure from fedora rawhide and run the systemtap tests. Pratyush were there changes in patches between these versions?  The only other difference is that the machine above was a fedora 24 machine rather than a RHELSA, so there would be differences in the compiler and other tools. The results (systemtap.log and systemtap.sum) are at:

I had rebased it over 4.8-rc2. This would have been the only change.

~Pratyush

> 
> http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/aarch64/20160817/
> 
> I the results have been sent to dejazilla, but dejazilla appears to be having issues with displaying results (https://web.elastic.org/~dejazilla/viewsummary.php?summary=%3D%27%3Ccdc0ada3-26b8-295d-2d3b-d8a88da83e17%40redhat.com%3E%27)
> 
> The results look pretty respectable
> 
> 		=== systemtap Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		8809
> # of unexpected failures	69
> # of unexpected successes	1
> # of expected failures		339
> # of unknown successes		3
> # of known failures		95
> # of untested testcases		749
> # of unsupported tests		33
> 
> There are about a dozen failures due to the the search for atomic regions going beyond the beginning of the function which prevents probes on a number of functions like the following test:
> 
> spawn stap /root/systemtap_write/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/bz1027459.stp
> WARNING: probe kernel.function("SyS_set_tid_address@kernel/fork.c:1234").call (address 0xfffffc00080cb528) registration error (rc -22)
> WARNING: probe kernel.function("SyS_sched_setaffinity@kernel/sched/core.c:4716").call (address 0xfffffc00081051b0) registration error (rc -22)
> WARNING: probe kernel.function("SyS_sched_get_priority_min@kernel/sched/core.c:5040").call (address 0xfffffc0008105688) registration error (rc -22)
> WARNING: probe kernel.function("SyS_sched_get_priority_max@kernel/sched/core.c:5013").call (address 0xfffffc0008105620) registration error (rc -22)
> 
> There are also some differences in the syscalls used on aarch64 that cause some of the tests to fail.
> 
> -Will

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-18 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-09 16:17 William Cohen
2016-06-09 19:52 ` William Cohen
2016-06-10  3:42   ` David Long
2016-06-10  5:49   ` David Long
2016-06-10 13:43     ` Pratyush Anand
2016-06-10 14:03       ` William Cohen
2016-06-10 14:37         ` David Long
2016-06-10 15:27           ` William Cohen
2016-06-10 14:20       ` David Long
2016-06-10 15:11         ` William Cohen
2016-06-10 17:07         ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-12 14:33     ` William Cohen
2016-07-13 18:26       ` David Long
2016-07-13 18:47         ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-13 19:45           ` William Cohen
2016-06-10 21:28 ` William Cohen
2016-06-10 21:37   ` William Cohen
2016-06-13  4:28   ` Pratyush Anand
2016-06-13 13:42     ` William Cohen
2016-06-22 20:24   ` William Cohen
2016-06-23  3:19     ` David Long
2016-06-23 13:42       ` William Cohen
2016-06-23 13:47         ` David Smith
2016-06-23 15:49       ` William Cohen
2016-06-23 18:26         ` David Long
2016-06-23 19:22           ` William Cohen
2016-06-27  2:57             ` David Long
2016-06-27 14:18             ` Pratyush Anand
2016-06-28  3:20               ` William Cohen
2016-07-04 12:46                 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-07 19:05                   ` David Long
2016-07-07 19:58                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2016-08-03 13:13                       ` Pratyush Anand
2016-08-03 14:51                         ` William Cohen
2016-08-03 15:11                           ` David Long
2016-08-03 17:40                         ` William Cohen
2016-08-03 20:00                           ` Lastest kprobes64 patch David Long
2016-08-03 20:01                             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2016-08-03 20:08                               ` David Long
2016-08-04  5:03                             ` Pratyush Anand
2016-08-04 13:07                               ` David Long
2016-08-04  4:42                           ` exercising current aarch64 kprobe support with systemtap Pratyush Anand
2016-08-04 13:57                             ` William Cohen
2016-08-04 14:36                               ` Pratyush Anand
2016-08-04 14:50                                 ` William Cohen
2016-08-04 20:51                                 ` William Cohen
2016-08-17 14:36                                   ` William Cohen
2016-08-17 18:04                                     ` David Smith
2016-08-17 18:28                                       ` William Cohen
2016-08-18 15:07                                         ` David Smith
2016-08-18 15:16                                           ` William Cohen
2016-08-18 15:39                                             ` David Smith
2016-08-18 14:55                                     ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-06-13 16:11 ` William Cohen
2016-06-13 16:15   ` William Cohen
2016-06-14  4:27   ` Pratyush Anand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160818145517.GA15921@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlinton@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).