RE: Expected errors from make check?

["Spirakis, Charles" <charles.spirakis@intel.com>]

Using a similar modification (I used pushd/popd instead of cd), I get the same failures. Interestingly, if I add the -v into the failing scripts, they then are listed as passing...

-- charles

The output of the five.stp without -v (from the command line - same as the make check error):

[cspiraki@cspiraki-lnote src]$ testsuite/buildok/five.stp
Pass 4: compilation failed.  Try again with '-v' (verbose) option.

The output of the five.stp with the -v option (from the command line - make check says success):

[cspiraki@cspiraki-lnote src]$ testsuite/buildok/five.stp
stap: invalid option --
SystemTap translator/driver (version 0.3.1 built 2005-08-29)
Copyright (C) 2005 Red Hat, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.

Usage: stap [options] FILE         Run script in file.
   or: stap [options] -            Run script on stdin.
   or: stap [options] -e SCRIPT    Run given script.

Options:
   --         no more options after this
   -v         verbose [set]
   -h         show help
   -V         show version
   -k         keep temporary directory
   -g         guru mode
   -p NUM     stop after pass NUM 1-5
              (parse, elaborate, translate, compile, run)
   -I DIR     look in DIR for additional .stp script files, in addition to
              /usr/local/share/systemtap/tapset
   -R DIR     look in DIR for runtime, instead of
              /usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime
   -m MODULE  set probe module name, instead of
              stap_500_1125366877
   -o FILE    send output to file instead of stdout
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: systemtap-owner@sources.redhat.com 
> [mailto:systemtap-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Peng Hongbo
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:27 PM
> To: Spirakis, Charles
> Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: Expected errors from make check?
> 
> ======= 2005-08-29 17:06:00 from Spirakis, Charles=======
> 
> >All --
> >
> >Seems like there may be a path issue or something with the makefile 
> >check/test scripts (see below). System is i686 running FC4 using the 
> >elfutils 114 via SRPMS.
> >
> 
> After modifying runtest.sh, I found 4 FAILs.
> 
> FAIL: ./testsuite/buildok/five.stp
> FAIL: ./testsuite/buildok/four.stp
> FAIL: ./testsuite/buildok/seven.stp
> FAIL: ./testsuite/buildok/six.stp
> 
> For four.stp, the detail err log is:
> # ./runtest.sh testsuite/buildok/four.stp -v # cat 
> testsuite/buildok-four.stp.err Created temporary directory 
> "/tmp/stapfz7WkA"
> Searched '/tmp/systemtap/src/tapset/2.6.11-1.1369_FC4/*.stp', 
> match count 0 Searched 
> '/tmp/systemtap/src/tapset/2.6.11/*.stp', match count 0 
> Searched '/tmp/systemtap/src/tapset/2.6/*.stp', match count 0 
> Searched '/tmp/systemtap/src/tapset/*.stp', match count 3 
> Pass 1: parsed user script and 3 library script(s).
> parsed '*' -> func '*'
> pattern 'ext3' matches module 'ext3'
> focused on module 'ext3' = [cca56000-cca765c9, bias 0]
> WARNING: dwfl_module_getdwarf() : relocation refers to 
> undefined symbol
> WARNING: no dwarf info found for module ext3 semantic error: 
> no match for probe point
>          while: resolving probe point 
> module("ext3").function("*") Pass 2: analyzed user script.  0 
> probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 global(s).
> Pass 2: analysis failed.  Try again with '-v' (verbose) option.
> Running /bin/rm -rf /tmp/stapfz7WkA
> # 
> 
> 
> 
> --- src/runtest.sh      2005-08-21 20:11:41.000000000 +0800
> +++ src.new/runtest.sh  2005-08-30 10:07:47.000000000 +0800
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ if [ ! -d testsuite ]; then
>    mkdir -p testsuite
>  fi
>  
> -SRCDIR=`dirname $0`
> -export SRCDIR
> +cd `dirname $0`
> +export SRCDIR=${PWD}
>  
>  SYSTEMTAP_TAPSET=$SRCDIR/tapset
>  export SYSTEMTAP_TAPSET
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 雅虎免费G邮箱－中国第一绝无垃圾邮件骚扰超大邮箱
> http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/?id=77071
> 
>