public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@google.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	        "Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
	        "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	        "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	darren@dvhart.com,         "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	        systemtap-ml <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Unified tracing buffer
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33307c790809231402o24c93820tcfbf80d116c729c3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809232157580.2038@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>

>> I think the tolerance is about 500 cycles. If that's not sufficient, I guess
>> we'll have to either live with some slight misordering (which people have
>> pointed out is kind of inevitable anyway) on these broken machines?
>> It was sufficient for what we were using it for, but maybe not for everyone.
>
> Well, I dont care about the trace reordering at all. I care about user
> space visible time going backwards issues observed via the
> gettimeofday vsyscall. 500 cycles should be fine, I doubt that we can
> migrate in less than that :)

Right, that's what we were interested in.

> I guess you try this only for machines where the TSC runs with
> constant frequency, right ?

We don't do DVFS on the 'broken' TSC machines, just halt.
But yes, it's selective

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-23 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <33307c790809191433w246c0283l55a57c196664ce77@mail.gmail.com>
2008-09-22 19:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-22 20:14   ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-22 22:27     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-22 23:12       ` Darren Hart
2008-09-23  0:06         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-22 23:17       ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-23  0:07         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23  0:13           ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-23 14:51             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 15:09               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-23 15:32                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 16:02                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-23 17:07                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 17:33                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-23 19:03                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 19:37                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-23 19:39                             ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-23 19:42                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-23 19:51                                 ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-23 20:05                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-23 21:02                                     ` Martin Bligh [this message]
2008-09-23 20:06                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 20:09                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-23 15:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-23  0:41           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-23  1:28             ` Roland Dreier
2008-09-23  1:40               ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23  2:08               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-23  2:27                 ` Darren Hart
2008-09-23  2:32                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-23  3:29               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-23  3:42                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-23  4:06                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-23  3:44                 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23  4:12                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23  4:18                     ` Martin Bligh
2008-09-23 15:25                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 10:54                     ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23  4:20                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-23 14:13                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-23  2:31             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-09-23  3:07             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 14:38       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-09-23 15:04         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-09-23 15:23         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-09-23 18:04           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-09-23 18:29             ` Martin Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=33307c790809231402o24c93820tcfbf80d116c729c3@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).