From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29931 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2005 19:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29791 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2005 19:26:08 -0000 Message-ID: <43724D4D.7080208@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:26:00 -0000 From: William Cohen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keshavamurthy Anil S CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: testsuits on IA64 References: <44BDAFB888F59F408FAE3CC35AB470410249FF19@orsmsx409> <4370CEF6.2050406@redhat.com> <20051108161654.A21161@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <437210C8.9020908@redhat.com> <20051109095130.A32424@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20051109095130.A32424@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 Keshavamurthy Anil S wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:07:52AM -0500, William Cohen wrote: > >>Keshavamurthy Anil S wrote: >> >>I don't have a ia64 machine handy to try things out on. Could you send >>me the output that comes on the console from "stap -v -k >>./systemtap.base/kmodule.stp"? I would like to see that error messages >>the compiler is producing when it attempts to produce the module. > > > Hi Will, > Here goes the output you requested, as mentioned earlier I don't have any problems > running individual tap scripts manually. It is only when I run runtest I see timeouts. Hi Anil, So the kmodule.stp test compiles and runs fine by itself? There was the following in the testrun.log: Running ./systemtap.base/kmodule.exp ... semantic error: FAIL: ./systemtap.base/kmodule.stp compilation I assumed that there was a problem with the compilation. So the individual tests work when run, e.g. "runtest --tool=systemtap ./systemtap.base/kmodule.exp"? What do the test results look with the newer version of elfutils? Still lots of failures? -Will