From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16092 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2006 15:11:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 16082 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2006 15:11:05 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:11:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k28FB0NT011996 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:11:00 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k28FAx111156; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:10:59 -0500 Received: from [172.16.59.162] (dhcp59-162.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.59.162]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k28FAxxf030020; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:10:59 -0500 Message-ID: <440EF403.8080409@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:11:00 -0000 From: William Cohen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" CC: "bibo,mao" , systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch]patch for some systemtap test cases failure References: <440BF7BC.7010001@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00737.txt.bz2 Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > "bibo,mao" writes: > > >>[...] >> set stappath [exec which stap] >>-set stpdpath [exec dirname $stappath]/../libexec/systemtap/stpd >>+set stpdpath [exec dirname $stappath]/stpd >>[...] > > > The pass-5 tests are meant to run against an *installed* copy of > systemtap (i.e., the result of a "make install"), not the parts as > they happen to be arranged in the build tree. In the former, the > stpd binary will not be alongside stap. > > - FChE What is the logic of making the pass-5 tests being run again *installed* copy of systemtap which the pass-[1234] tests are only run against the build tree? It seems logical to make it possible to be able to run that pass-[1234] tests against installed systemtap also. -Will