Re: proposed relayfs changes and systemtap

[William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>]

Tom Zanussi wrote:
> William Cohen writes:
>  > Tom Zanussi wrote:
>  > > Tom Zanussi writes:
>  > >  > Hi,
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Someone over the weekend posted a patch to remove the filesystem part
>  > >  > of relayfs and instead have applications' relayfs files live in other
>  > >  > filesytems instead:
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114036950922176&w=2
>  > > 
>  > > Actually, this is probably a better link to the patches and thread:
>  > > 
>  > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114038358624583&w=2
>  > > 
>  > > Tom
>  > > 
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > Hi Tom,
>  > 
>  > The nightly tests buildok and pass-5 tests failed due to the following 
>  > checkin:
>  > 
>  > 2006-03-15 Tom Zanussi  <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
>  > 
>  >          * configure.ac: Add check for relayfs version.
>  >          * configure: Regenerated.
>  >          * stp_check.in: Remove bundled relayfs loading/compilation, add
>  >          check for relay (vs relayfs).
>  > 
>  > The parser tests won't find relayfs-config.h nor will the pass-5 tests 
>  > find the include file.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just checked in new changes for that - can you get the latest from
> cvs and try again?  Sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> Tom

That fixed the problem. The tests seem to run much better now.

-Will