public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gui,Jian" <guij@cn.ibm.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	systemtap@sources.redhat.com,
	        "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: "no match" semantic error for some existing probe points
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45486C15.907@cn.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orbqnr1wzf.fsf@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Indeed, but this is an inlined call of ptrace_disabled.  What we're
> missing is info about the clear_single_step() inlined call.  However,
> in my kernel source tree, clear_single_step is a macro, not a
> function, so you won't get debug info for it without -g3 and, even
> then, you may not get any line numbers whatsoever for the function
> that does nothing but call a macro.
In 2.6.18.1, clear_single_step is defined as an inlined call in
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c (ppc64) or
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c (ppc32). Although it is also defined
as macro in arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c, I think ptrace_disable is
using its inlined call definition.

> 
> I'm going to need preprocessed sources, a compilation command line and
> a compiler version number in order to try to get more detailed info
> and fix the compiler bug, if there is one.
> 
> Ideally, such info should be in a Systemtap bug report at
> sources.redhat.com or bugzilla.redhat.com.
> 
Thanks. I've opened bug 3441 for this and attached some data.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3441

Please let me know if more info is needed.

-Guijian

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-01  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-17 10:17 Gui,Jian
2006-10-17 20:55 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-18  4:00   ` Gui,Jian
2006-10-19  7:40     ` Gui,Jian
2006-10-24 17:58       ` Roland McGrath
2006-10-30  6:12         ` Gui,Jian
2006-10-30 22:07           ` Roland McGrath
2006-11-01  7:03             ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-11-01 12:32               ` Gui,Jian [this message]
2006-11-07  7:52                 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-11-07 14:34                   ` Gui,Jian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45486C15.907@cn.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=guij@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).