From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10208 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2006 19:18:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 10188 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2006 19:18:05 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from skunk.mtbrook.bozemanpass.com (HELO skunk.mtbrook.bozemanpass.com) (69.145.82.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:17:55 +0000 Received: from [69.145.82.218] (unknown [69.145.82.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skunk.mtbrook.bozemanpass.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB02B558795 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:17:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <454A4462.2030500@boreham.org> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:53:00 -0000 From: David Boreham Reply-To: david_list@boreham.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SystemTAP Subject: Re: Anyone tried SystemTap with the latest RHEL5 Beta refresh References: <9AE298E00BCF7B469C04BE82FCE78B8701C74AAD@scsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com> <1161980695.31009.17.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <45464423.4070709@us.ibm.com> <20061030183343.GQ4978@redhat.com> <4547D66B.3010505@us.ibm.com> <4549264C.7090700@redhat.com> <1162493480.5293.23.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20061102190900.GG4978@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20061102190900.GG4978@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q4/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2 Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > >I believe that the debuginfo packages are at this time not placed on >CDs at all. However, they are online in the same place where the .iso >files were. > > > The kernel-debuginfo RPM wouldn't fix on a CD.