From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23712 invoked by alias); 22 May 2007 21:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 23683 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2007 21:05:01 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2007 21:04:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4ML4qMt031814; Tue, 22 May 2007 17:04:52 -0400 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4ML4psx026296; Tue, 22 May 2007 17:04:51 -0400 Received: from [172.16.59.151] (dhcp59-151.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.59.151]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l4ML4ppq021256; Tue, 22 May 2007 17:04:51 -0400 Message-ID: <46535AEE.4070103@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:05:00 -0000 From: William Cohen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wilder CC: fche@sourceware.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: new systemtap snapshot available References: <20070519142735.32490.qmail@sourceware.org> <46535EE6.7050209@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <46535EE6.7050209@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 David Wilder wrote: > I upgraded the kernel on my s390x test platform to 2.6.22-rc2 and ran > this weeks snapshot. > Unfortunately only 137 out of 300 or so tests ran. I wont post post the > results until I find the problem. > > Dave.. This sounds like a systematic problem. Are tests failing in the same manner? Is there a matching vmlinux in /boot? -Will