From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10674 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2012 12:37:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10375 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2012 12:37:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (HELO mx4-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:37:34 +0000 Received: from zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.19]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9UCbV3V001214; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:37:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Hughes To: Jon VanAlten Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net, Lukas Berk , Mark Wielaard , Andrew Hughes Message-ID: <46828227.1968825.1351600651879.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1299938704.3549181.1351561757214.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > I've updated the patch slightly to reflect a correction in > > > > psScavenge.cpp that was causing a build error when > > > > icedtea-debug > > > > wasn't > > > > specified. The rest of the patch is unchanged from before. > > > > > > > > > > And I've now pushed this. I know it's preferred that new work > > > goes to forest in general, but this was discussed earlier when > > > patch was originally posted, and afaict the feeling was it > > > would be better to move all systemtap related patches there in > > > one step some time later[1]. > > > > > > Thanks Lukas for this contribution! > > > > > > > Why has this been pushed? We don't want more patches adding to > > IcedTea7. > > Please revert. > > > > I'm sorry for the mix-up. Andrew and I discussed this further > offline (sorry, this did not happen in public, but neither was it > intentionally private). > > We reached the conclusion (I believe) that it would be best to > wait and hear from Mark about plans referred to in email archive > link below. Mark, do you have any comment here? Would it be > for the best to revert here and apply instead to 7 forest? > > Also, I've backported this changeset to icedtea6, and it should > also probably go somehow to 8. Can someone refresh me, as a > rather seldom-contributor here, what the correct repos are for > these? > Patch needs to be applied to: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/ http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea7-forest/jdk/ http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea8-forest/jdk/ and reverted from: http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea7/ as all patches for 7 & 8 go to the forest. > Thanks! > jon > > > > [1] > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2012-August/020066.html > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew :) > > > > Free Java Software Engineer > > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > > > PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) > > Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 > > > > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07