From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3324 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2007 15:09:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 3316 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2007 15:09:27 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e35.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:09:21 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8EF99mK029295 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:09:09 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l8EF99kD496020 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:09:09 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8EF98he012736 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:09:09 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wecm-9-67-0-27.wecm.ibm.com [9.67.0.27]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l8EF96ad012583; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:09:07 -0600 Message-ID: <46EAA3EB.3090909@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:21:00 -0000 From: Vara Prasad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wenji Huang CC: systemTAP Subject: Re: Bug 4930 References: <46E9FE4F.7060008@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <46E9FE4F.7060008@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00591.txt.bz2 Wenji Huang wrote: > Hi all, > > Regarding to bug 4930, I created patches for it > (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4930). > Please kindly review it. If no objection, I will commit it. > > Thanks, > Wenji Can we follow/change our review process to that of kernel where patch is posted inline in the mailing list for review instead of posting/placing elsewhere? I am hoping having patches readily available in the mail client improves our review process and avoids costly mistakes. bye, Vara Prasad