From: William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: SystemTAP <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Version 0.6.1 systemtap for Fedora 8 and available for testing
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479F56FE.8010802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <479F4B1B.1040500@RedHat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1275 bytes --]
Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hey Will,
>
> William Cohen wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> There is a newer version of systemtap, 0.6.1-1.fc8, built for Fedora 8.
>> It is currently available for testing. With some feedback of successful
>> testing it
>> will be moved to fedora 8 stable updates. The fedora systemtap testing
>> rpms can be obtained from via yum with either of the following commands:
> I'm getting the the following syntax error with systemtap, 0.6.1-1.fc9
> on the latest rawhide kernel (2.6.24-3):
>
> /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/stack-i386.c:26:22: error: #if with no expression
> In file included from /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/stack.c:34,
> from /tmp/stapkrsLQD/stap_b2ef1e50aab83af35ff4ac429676aa44_12262.c:44:
> /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/stack-i386.c: In function '__stp_stack_print':
> /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/stack-i386.c:30: error: 'ebp' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/stack-i386.c:30: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/stack-i386.c:30: error: for each function it appears in.)
>
> steved.
That problem has been fixed in the cvs repostitory recently. The attached patch
shows what needs to be fixed up. To correct the problem.
-Will
[-- Attachment #2: stack-i386_else.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1082 bytes --]
? testsuite/systemtap.syscall/hidden
Index: runtime/ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/systemtap/src/runtime/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.237
retrieving revision 1.238
diff -U2 -u -r1.237 -r1.238
--- runtime/ChangeLog 15 Jan 2008 16:57:20 -0000 1.237
+++ runtime/ChangeLog 27 Jan 2008 18:27:40 -0000 1.238
@@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
+2008-01-27 Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@elastic.org>
+
+ * stack-i386.c (__stp_stack_print): Correct #elif->#else typo.
+
2008-01-14 Martin Hunt <hunt@redhat.com>
Index: runtime/stack-i386.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/systemtap/src/runtime/stack-i386.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -U2 -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- runtime/stack-i386.c 18 Jan 2008 08:47:31 -0000 1.6
+++ runtime/stack-i386.c 27 Jan 2008 18:27:40 -0000 1.7
@@ -24,5 +24,5 @@
#ifdef STAPCONF_X86_UNIREGS
unsigned long ebp = regs->bp;
- #elif
+ #else
unsigned long ebp = regs->ebp;
#endif
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-29 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 16:49 William Cohen
2008-01-29 15:51 ` Steve Dickson
2008-01-29 16:40 ` William Cohen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479F56FE.8010802@redhat.com \
--to=wcohen@redhat.com \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).