From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29855 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2008 22:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 29848 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Mar 2008 22:59:56 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:59:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m23MxWIB001236; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:59:32 -0500 Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [172.16.76.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m23MxUIF011719; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:59:31 -0500 Received: from [172.16.83.2] (dhcp83-2.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.2]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m23MxTQo030237; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:59:29 -0500 Message-ID: <47CC82D0.404@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:59:00 -0000 From: Masami Hiramatsu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ananth@in.ibm.com, systemtap@sources.redhat.com, jkenisto@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.25-rc2-mm1] fix a null pointer bug in register_kretprobe References: <47CC7B1C.1060305@redhat.com> <20080303143610.3a8c2f4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080303143610.3a8c2f4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:26:36 -0500 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > This: > >> Subject: [PATCH][2.6.25-rc2-mm1] fix a null pointer bug in register_kretprobe > > implies (to me) that the patch fixes a bug which is only in -mm. But > afacit this is a bugfix against mainline, yes? Yes, that bug is also in mainline... Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu Software Engineer Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc. Software Solutions Division e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com