From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11574 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 14:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 11557 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2008 14:35:08 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:34:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAKEYB1c019426 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:34:11 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAKEYB2E013219 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:34:11 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dhcp231-126.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.231.126]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAKEYBgx021686; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:34:11 -0500 Message-ID: <49257562.8000609@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:35:00 -0000 From: William Cohen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Wielaard CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , SystemTAP Subject: Re: New Systemtap-0.8 RPM available for testing on Fedora 8 and Fedora 9 References: <49246BEC.2020605@redhat.com> <1227180723.3306.10.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <1227189973.3306.29.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <1227189973.3306.29.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 Mark Wielaard wrote: > I have given it a thumbs up at > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9695 > (where I saw Will already posted the above results...) > > Cheers, > > Mark > Hi Mark, Thanks for giving it a test and making a comment about it on the updates webpage. It looks like the karma score is only affected by comments from people actually logged into bodhi (and only one thumbs up or thumbs down per log in). However, that is really minor. Just need two more people to give thumbs up for it to be pushed automatically to stable with Karma of 3. Of course it can always be manually pushed to stable. -Will