From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10728 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2009 22:40:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10720 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2009 22:40:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:40:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0CMe6K6002279 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:40:06 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0CMe6SN014645; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:40:06 -0500 Received: from [10.11.231.126] (dhcp231-126.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.231.126]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0CMe5MZ029902; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:40:06 -0500 Message-ID: <496BC6C4.4050204@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:40:00 -0000 From: William Cohen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Cox CC: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] systemtap.spec References: <1231795981.2846.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1231795981.2846.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q1/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 Stan Cox wrote: > This adds a subpackage 'static-user' that installs /usr/include/sdt.h > and /usr/bin/dtrace which enables postgres to build with stap support, > assuming that it is built with -g. Subpackage name suggestions or > other comments? Hi Stan, Looking through the patch shouldn't there be a sdt.h file in the patch? I don't see the sdt.h file in the upstream git or in the patch. static in the rpm name might be confused with rpms that include .a files. Maybe user-markers-devel, which is getting a bit long. -Will