From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21820 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2009 14:05:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 21617 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2009 14:05:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:05:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3KE4x0d026857 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:04:59 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3KE4vZj019700 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:04:57 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dst61.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.175]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3KE4uUv001183; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:04:56 -0400 Message-ID: <49EC810B.5020407@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:05:00 -0000 From: David Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland McGrath CC: Systemtap List Subject: Re: utrace syscall arguments References: <49E8967F.6000604@redhat.com> <20090417183904.DF270FC35F@magilla.sf.frob.com> <49E8F25E.6080506@redhat.com> <20090417212956.7C6C7FC35F@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090417221207.EC4A0FC35F@magilla.sf.frob.com> In-Reply-To: <20090417221207.EC4A0FC35F@magilla.sf.frob.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2 Roland McGrath wrote: >> I feel positive I am missing something completely here! > > Oh, wait. We are talking about ia64. So it probably actually can go > forward and backward in time. We need to get the ia64 kernel people on > this, for sure. I can see the potential rip in the fabric of spacetime, > but I don't really understand all the physics involved much at all. The > corners of this might well differ in RHEL5 vs the vanilla ia64 kernel. ... interesting technical discussion deleted ... OK, you've convinced me. I'll try to get access to an ia64 machine again and investigate further. -- David Smith dsmith@redhat.com Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax)