public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
To: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Backward compatibility for insn probe point
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F61D09.8090503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D3E3DF.1000108@us.ibm.com>

Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Frank has already made the changes in runtime/itrace.c to support
> backward compatibility with older utrace.
> I wanted to test the insn probe point on an older utrace, so I built
> and installed systemtap 0.9.5 on a ppc970 blade running RHEL 5.3.  I
> ran the following simple test:
> 
> # stap -c /bin/ls simple-test.stp /bin/ls -o simple-out -k -vvv 
>      where simple-test.stp is . . .
> =========simple-test.stp ========================
> global instrs = 0
> 
> probe begin {
> 	printf("systemtap starting probe\n")
> }
> 
> probe process(@1).insn {
> 	instrs += 1
> }
> 
> probe end { printf("systemtap ending probe\n")
> printf("itraced = %d\n", instrs)
> }
> ==================================
> 
> The result of the above test is that the stap command hangs at
> "stapio:start_cmd:195 execing target_cmd /bin/ls".  If I Ctl-C the
> job, it finished (i.e, I see "Pass 5: run completed ..."), but the
> output file contents indicate the insn probe was not hit (i.e.,
> "itraced = 0").
> 
> Any suggestions on where to look for the problem?

I took a look at this and fixed it.  For more details, see
<http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10091>.

-- 
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-27 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-01 21:59 Maynard Johnson
2009-04-27 21:01 ` David Smith [this message]
2009-04-29 13:56   ` Maynard Johnson
2009-04-29 21:08   ` Maynard Johnson
2009-04-30 18:00     ` David Smith
2009-04-30 20:48       ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-12 16:06         ` David Smith
2009-05-12 18:20           ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-13 15:04             ` David Smith
2009-05-13 18:24               ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-14 15:11                 ` David Smith
2009-05-14 18:41                   ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-14 19:01                   ` Maynard Johnson
2009-05-14 19:44                     ` David Smith
2009-05-14 21:36                       ` David Smith
2009-05-15 13:52                         ` ia64 hang when using itrace (was Re: Backward compatibility for insn probe point) David Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F61D09.8090503@redhat.com \
    --to=dsmith@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).