From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19228 invoked by alias); 14 May 2009 19:44:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19219 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2009 19:44:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:44:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4EJi5FE005010; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:44:05 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4EJi4vJ031370; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:44:04 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dst61.hsv.redhat.com [172.16.16.175]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4EJi11G027029; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:44:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4A0C7482.3010103@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:44:00 -0000 From: David Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: maynardj@us.ibm.com CC: Roland McGrath , systemtap@sourceware.org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" Subject: Re: Backward compatibility for insn probe point References: <49D3E3DF.1000108@us.ibm.com> <49F61D09.8090503@redhat.com> <49F8C1C0.8070208@us.ibm.com> <49F9E71D.2070500@redhat.com> <20090430203302.5FFA0FC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com> <4A099E6B.8090501@redhat.com> <20090512181950.19BCCFC35D@magilla.sf.frob.com> <4A0AE179.9050801@redhat.com> <20090513182359.0CF33FC35D@magilla.sf.frob.com> <4A0C347D.9060204@redhat.com> <4A0C6A90.6070306@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4A0C6A90.6070306@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q2/txt/msg00589.txt.bz2 Maynard Johnson wrote: >> David Smith wrote: >> One last thing. I thought I'd try block stepping, so I got access to an >> ia64 machine. Unfortunately, using systemtap insn probes (either single >> or block step) lock up the system with a spinlock lockup. Sigh. > > Does anyone know who maintains ia64/utrace? David, was the above error > on "old" utrace or "new"? The error is on "old" utrace. I'm trying to look into the ia64 utrace problem now. -- David Smith dsmith@redhat.com Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax)