From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
"K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes 4/7] tracing/kprobes: Add event profiling support
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAAA550.9010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911031253.GD16396@nowhere>
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:53:30PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE
>> +
>> +/* Kprobe profile handler */
>> +static __kprobes int kprobe_profile_func(struct kprobe *kp,
>> + struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + struct trace_probe *tp = container_of(kp, struct trace_probe, rp.kp);
>> + struct ftrace_event_call *call =&tp->call;
>> + struct kprobe_trace_entry *entry;
>> + int size, i, pc;
>> + unsigned long irq_flags;
>> +
>> + local_save_flags(irq_flags);
>> + pc = preempt_count();
>> +
>> + size = SIZEOF_KPROBE_TRACE_ENTRY(tp->nr_args);
>
>
>
> Note that the end-result must be u64 aligned for perf ring buffer.
> And this is a bit tricky.
> What is inserted in the perf ring buffer is:
>
> raw_trace + (u32)raw_trace_size
>
> So we must ensure that sizeof(raw_trace) + sizeof(u32)
> is well u64 aligned.
>
> We don't insert the trace_size ourself though, this is done
> from kernel/perf_counter.c
>
> But we need to handle the size of the size (sorry) in the final
> alignment.
> To sum-up: sizeof(raw_trace) doesn't need (shouldn't) to be u64
> aligned but sizeof(raw_trace) + sizeof(u32) must be.
>
> Given this aligned size, we then substract it by sizeof(u32)
> to have the needed size of the raw entry.
>
> This result gives you the size of char raw_data[], which
> is also the same size passed in perf_tpcounter_event().
>
> See?
Ah, I see. So the size to write to perf_tpcounter_event must be
'(a multiple number of sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32)', right?
(Hmm, why would not perf_counter align data by itself? :)
>
> That's why we have this in trace/ftrace.h:
>
> __data_size = "the real entry data size"
> __entry_size = ALIGN(__data_size + sizeof(*entry) + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
> __entry_size -= sizeof(u32);
>
> do {
> char raw_data[__entry_size];
> ...
> perf_tpcounter_event(event_call->id, __addr, __count, entry,
> __entry_size);
> ...
> } while (0);
Ok, I'll do that.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-11 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 23:51 [PATCH tracing/kprobes 0/7] tracing/kprobes: kprobe-based event tracer update and perf support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 5/7] tracing/kprobes: Add argument name support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-11 16:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 16:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 2/7] tracing/kprobes: Fix probe offset to be unsigned Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 1/7] x86/ptrace: Fix regs_get_argument_nth() to add correct offset Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 1:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 4/7] tracing/kprobes: Add event profiling support Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 3:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 16:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14 3:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <4AAE7540.9090009@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 18:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <4AAE9B41.3020905@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 21:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-15 4:52 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2009-09-11 19:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2009-09-14 3:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-13 10:07 ` [BUGFIX] kprobes: prevent re-registration of the same kprobe Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
[not found] ` <4AADA0BB.4030307@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 10:05 ` [BUGFIX] kprobes: prevent re-registration of the same kprobe - take2 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
[not found] ` <4AAE6E85.9020002@redhat.com>
2009-09-15 5:19 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2009-09-16 23:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:51 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 3/7] tracing/kprobes: Cleanup kprobe tracer code Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 2:33 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-11 2:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 23:52 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 7/7] tracing/kprobes: Support custom subsystem for each kprobe event Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-10 23:52 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 6/7] tracing/kprobes: Show event name in trace output Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 1:33 ` [PATCH tracing/kprobes 0/7] tracing/kprobes: kprobe-based event tracer update and perf support Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 1:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-11 15:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14 3:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <4AAE7A5D.8010503@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 20:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <4AAEB149.2070300@redhat.com>
2009-09-14 21:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 19:03 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-09-11 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-11 19:51 ` Mark Wielaard
[not found] ` <20090911200317.GA3827@infradead.org>
2009-09-12 1:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-11 19:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 15:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 21:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-09-14 2:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AAAA550.9010203@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).