From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2680 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2009 05:41:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 2672 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2009 05:41:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com (HELO rgminet11.oracle.com) (148.87.113.123) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:41:30 +0000 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rgminet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id nB45fDDL018320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:41:14 GMT Received: from acsmt353.oracle.com (acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id nB3BcwIB008198; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:41:03 GMT Received: from abhmt018.oracle.com by acsmt355.oracle.com with ESMTP id 792479171259905233; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:40:33 -0800 Received: from dhcp-beijing-cdc-10-182-120-164.cn.oracle.com (/10.182.121.213) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:40:32 -0800 Message-ID: <4B18A054.80607@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:41:00 -0000 From: Wenji Huang Reply-To: wenji.huang@oracle.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , "systemtap@sources.redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix regression in statistic operations References: <20091202192710.GJ10331@redhat.com> <20091203154442046.00000005292@ETSD-Ora-lap2> <20091204043756.GA29689@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: <20091204043756.GA29689@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00801.txt.bz2 Anton Vorontsov wrote: [...] > > Oops. :-/ This patch should fix the issue, thanks for noticing and > sorry for the inconvenience. > > This time I checked (on x86_64) that no new regressions introduced. > Confirmed. The patch fixed the regression. Thanks. Regards, Wenji