public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	       systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	       Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	       DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf probe: Don't compile CFI related code if elfutils is old
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 07:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE8571E.4020403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100510183654.GH6450@erda.amd.com>

Robert Richter wrote:
> On 10.05.10 13:28:54, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, May 10, 2010 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>>> Check elfutils version, and if it is old don't compile
>>> CFI analysis code. This allows to compile perf with
>>> old elfutils.
>>
>> _ELFUTILS_PREREQ was introduced in:
>>
>> commit fbc7245df72ce0142f0a21fa0f4f88c97278bf60
>> Author: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
>> Date:   Tue Dec 16 17:03:03 2008 -0800
>>
>> Which was released in elfutils 0.138, guess this is coverage enough?
>> Richard, which version is in your machine?
> 
> Right, this does not work, I am using 0.131. As expected,
> "_ELFUTILS_PREREQ" is not defined:
> 
> gcc -o builtin-probe.o -c -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 -Werror -O6 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -fstack-protector-all -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Iutil/include -Iarch/x86/include -I/usr/include/elfutils -DDWARF_SUPPORT -DNO_NEWT_SUPPORT -DNO_LIBPERL -DSHA1_HEADER='<openssl/sha.h>'  builtin-probe.c
> In file included from builtin-probe.c:43:
> util/probe-finder.h:47:5: error: "_ELFUTILS_PREREQ" is not defined
> util/probe-finder.h:47:21: error: missing binary operator before token "("
> make: *** [builtin-probe.o] Error 1
> 
> Why not create a compile test as for NO_DWARF in tools/perf/Makefile?

Hmm, ok, version.h is also introduced at the same time.

# git log ./config/version.h.in
commit fbc7245df72ce0142f0a21fa0f4f88c97278bf60
Author: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Dec 16 17:03:03 2008 -0800

    Install elfutils/version.h header for library compatibility checking.

So, I think we'd better set NO_DWARF if the elfutils
is older than 0.138, since we can't check API compatibility
easily.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-10 17:48 Masami Hiramatsu
2010-05-10 17:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-11  4:54   ` Robert Richter
2010-05-11  7:26     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2010-05-11 10:41       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-11 12:36         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-05-11 14:40           ` [PATCH -tip] perf probe: Check older elfutils and set NO_DWARF Masami Hiramatsu
2010-05-11 20:03             ` Robert Richter
2010-05-11 18:00           ` [PATCH -tip] perf probe: Don't compile CFI related code if elfutils is old Mark Wielaard
2010-05-11  8:13     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE8571E.4020403@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).