From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4698 invoked by alias); 20 May 2010 21:03:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 4579 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2010 21:03:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 21:03:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4KL3pdB006531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:03:51 -0400 Received: from [10.11.231.159] (dhcp231-159.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.231.159]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4KL3oBO020268; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:03:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF5A3A9.8040301@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 18:37:00 -0000 From: Stan Cox User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc11 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: Re: debuginfoless static user probes References: <4BC29670.7040809@redhat.com> <4BCF5BE6.3000404@redhat.com> <4BDF2ABA.1030402@redhat.com> <4BE8178A.6080509@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BE8178A.6080509@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 Just checking before committing. The current default is to use debuginfoless static user probes and fall back on the version 1 debuginfo probes if the application is built with -DSTAP_SDT_V1. Does that seem a reasonable default?