public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, dsmith@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Fixed PR13146 by not allowing memory allocations to sleep (Was: [SCM] systemtap: system-wide probe/trace tool branch, master, updated. release-1.6-151-g8e794e9)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E82481E.8060502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317135124.3361.22.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>

On 09/27/2011 07:52 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:39 +0000, dsmith@sourceware.org wrote:
>> commit 8e794e9dfeea5a48b84442b92dea6c17b9ef75d1
>> Author: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
>> Date:   Thu Sep 1 09:39:15 2011 -0500
>>
>>     Fixed PR13146 by not allowing memory allocations to sleep.
>>     
>>     * runtime/alloc.c:  Turn off __GFP_WAIT when allocating memory.
>>     * runtime/transport/ring_buffer.c (__stp_alloc_ring_buffer): Ditto.
>>     * runtime/counter.c (_stp_counter_init): Handles memory allocation failure
>>       better.
>>     * runtime/task_finder.c (__stp_call_mmap_callbacks_with_addr): Better
>>       cleanup if memory allocation fails.
> 
> Sorry for the late reply. But I am suspecting this commit of causing
> accasional (though not very frequent) test failures that say:
>   ERROR: context (size 8352) allocation failed
> 
> I suspect that is caused because the context is one of the larger
> allocations at systemtap_module_init time. And because we are no longer
> allowed to GFP_WAIT it is more likely to fail now. Would it be
> possible/make sense to allow GFP_WAIT for allocations made from context
> like systemtap_module_init() that may sleep because they are made from
> user context?

I agree, those contexts which can sleep, should.  Not only does this
make it more likely we'll get the memory we want, but also makes us
better citizens with the rest of the kernel.

Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-27 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110901143940.13672.qmail@sourceware.org>
2011-09-27 14:52 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-09-27 22:03   ` Josh Stone [this message]
2011-09-27 23:01     ` Jim Keniston
2011-09-28 12:12       ` Mark Wielaard
2011-10-05 13:44         ` David Smith
2011-10-05 13:47       ` David Smith
2011-10-05 15:24         ` Jim Keniston
2011-10-05 16:00         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2011-10-25 12:07     ` Fixed PR13146 by not allowing memory allocations to sleep Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-10-25 12:19       ` Mark Wielaard
2011-10-31 10:26         ` Mark Wielaard
2011-10-31 15:19           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-10-31 15:30             ` Mark Wielaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E82481E.8060502@redhat.com \
    --to=jistone@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjw@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).