From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14254 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 21:54:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 14237 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 21:54:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:53:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pATLrqHg008143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:53:52 -0500 Received: from t510.usersys.redhat.com (dhcp-10-15-1-97.hsv.redhat.com [10.15.1.97]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pATLrpAE024573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:53:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4ED5546F.2070202@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:39:00 -0000 From: David Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Stone CC: systemtap@sourceware.org, Srikar Dronamraju Subject: Re: Initial stap support for inode-based uprobes References: <4DD5DEAA.3050908@redhat.com> <4EC3F556.4010902@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC3F556.4010902@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 On 11/16/2011 11:39 AM, David Smith wrote: > I just got through running the systemtap testsuite on 2 different > configurations: > > 1) stock f16 kernel and HEAD systemtap > > # of expected passes 3096 > # of unexpected failures 63 > # of unexpected successes 8 > # of expected failures 259 > # of untested testcases 61 > # of unsupported tests 4 > > 2) f16 kernel with the new inode-based uprobes built-in and systemtap > with a merged dsmith/task_finder2 and jistone/inode-uprobes branches > > # of expected passes 2638 > # of unexpected failures 329 > # of unexpected successes 9 > # of expected failures 251 > # of untested testcases 70 > # of unsupported tests 4 > > That isn't too bad for a first stab. Here's the link to the diff in > dejazilla: > > I've looked into this a bit, and the lack of uprobes return probes causes a good number of failures. I've just checked in a change to uprobes.exp, so that it tests .call and .return probes individually (as well as together). The inode-based uprobes code passes the .call probe test. -- David Smith dsmith@redhat.com Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax)