From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23405 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2013 22:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23395 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2013 22:55:56 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e39.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.160) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:55:56 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:55:54 -0600 Received: from d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.166) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:55:52 -0600 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4A638C804D for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:55:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r5JMtocA41812144 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:55:50 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r5JMtoRo015738 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:55:50 -0300 Received: from [9.70.82.124] ([9.70.82.124]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r5JMto4B015726 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:55:50 -0300 Message-ID: <51C236F6.8080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:55:00 -0000 From: Hien Nguyen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: systemtap@sourceware.org Subject: stap --rlimit-stack=1 does not behave as expected in RHEL6.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13061922-3620-0000-0000-00000335051C X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 Under RHEL6.4 and systemtap-1.8x, I run the rlimit.exp testcase, it failed this test FAIL: rlimit STACK small Upon looking under the hood, it looks like the test doing this and expecting stap to crash or fail. exec stap --rlimit-stack=1 -p4 systemtap.base/rlimit.stp However, stap did not crash and successfully built the stap-xxx.ko. I saw a bug filed on this, but there is no follow up http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13977 I wonder if anyone run into this same issue. Thanks, Hien.