From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25224 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 15:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25198 invoked by uid 89); 6 Nov 2013 15:57:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-vc0-f172.google.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-vc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:57:49 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ks9so6786893vcb.31 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:57:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wHiJuVWyad9E6G+GpS22/UbvFRxnQ5ke2lG76psYkaM=; b=KZ0eNQ8erXx0nJieMx8RAgg+2Vz9+NTwD0RHEQeBjy3kuBc1aovGFvRchHD1V4z1MP e01g/OsQJGFq3RdalPMHmdVBdZEeaWeJhFlNClxYjlqcsA1bcju5hiklMvw7FC81oEmM lu46aHORaN8OTCwZ9zSFRsjFxUpcBcrBw0lDfskydQHOffySdwEi7IKmwB4P4szORFti cQNGbxJd7LWGZJkLzy2bs+JtHO6+P4YWmytmM3oUBHXfq5kqc0Z30iJy+QxNsr9/94D8 a+tTUoCWyDjJFzDzG1M4F8OmmeDovcCUeAZtHLET0+N9fCzEw+2rTQvitTk2m3MZpP9U Na5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRdB0iwg43uxYgw55RaV3rrYy+rxBd3aMVofA2rldPZEUz2OgtUvvWSwHVMUPrdk9fslSh X-Received: by 10.58.67.168 with SMTP id o8mr3030116vet.22.1383753460994; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:57:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.10.29] (c-76-24-48-141.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [76.24.48.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm27247939vek.0.2013.11.06.07.57.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:57:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527A66EF.2050800@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:57:00 -0000 From: David Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Cohen CC: Naresh Kamboju , "systemtap@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Segmenation fault for systemtap tests using the arm uprobes support References: <5229DF78.4060301@redhat.com> <5229E091.1090802@linaro.org> <52681E03.8080509@redhat.com> <52701F7A.8070102@linaro.org> <527956C8.9050401@redhat.com> <527986F9.7030204@linaro.org> <527A5F1F.6060000@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <527A5F1F.6060000@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q4/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 On 11/06/13 10:24, William Cohen wrote: > > Hi David, > > With the uprobe-v2 version I only saw one test that appeared to fail because of a sigsegv: > Are you testing on the same hardware? It's conceivable that could make a difference, especially if the number of CPU's is different. > > When searching for ways to test uprobes support I cam across https://github.com/rabinv/uprobes-test . Are these tests useful or have they been orphaned? > Yes, they are very useful. I run them all the time. Note there are some expected failures late in the run, also apparently these tests do not test uretprobes. -dl