From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25067 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 02:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24933 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2013 02:41:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qa0-f43.google.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-qa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:41:56 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ii20so108344qab.16 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:41:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CoTF+trrzL0m+S758sLMyQfq8KAQYasUb3tirn3G5rk=; b=FYGelxZsFJxJ599ilVKQklzZvUpO/blECm2Jb1VY9HyXV5YRHzioMOoHwulTYIcu6l UJBb2B2vYLSowDGYHO0XTcmmAtlbeOoZEMEtg3f/Z7izNW4MKXRhiJkIf1aa+s1WI6YL e5SkOtyjlrBeTuj4aBPrUaYv1E07dMkBynO87GXWaEaMdh6hlToGS4Tr+r2bARrvod6v J4Modbawi38s5lsymPEBMKFtzxmTMsHuHp719eyX43hhC/v4J18fC3wHjzT1Kd14Gk8l gfZmVgYbZbQtoz68ULL+++z3kiN5uy9S7t8hzQXiZ1JuL6Vn5i1dbCIQySY+PPk9Ednr vWNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhnbmcHp1KSqkKhOqk1Nb6jqvcFQh9Ft8QCcNNxNBd6DJrFnpAK8jhrKtcpz++K1sc22nO X-Received: by 10.49.116.5 with SMTP id js5mr17299930qeb.36.1385088108331; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:41:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (pool-72-71-243-183.cncdnh.fast00.myfairpoint.net. [72.71.243.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p17sm5652710qak.4.2013.11.21.18.41.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:41:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <528EC46A.9050308@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:42:00 -0000 From: David Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Cohen CC: Naresh Kamboju , "systemtap@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Segmenation fault for systemtap tests using the arm uprobes support References: <5229DF78.4060301@redhat.com> <5229E091.1090802@linaro.org> <52681E03.8080509@redhat.com> <52701F7A.8070102@linaro.org> <527956C8.9050401@redhat.com> <527986F9.7030204@linaro.org> <527A5F1F.6060000@redhat.com> <527A66EF.2050800@linaro.org> <527A6F63.3070004@redhat.com> <527D2971.9040103@linaro.org> <528EBD68.9040904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <528EBD68.9040904@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-q4/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On 11/21/13 21:11, William Cohen wrote: > On 11/08/2013 01:12 PM, David Long wrote: >> On 11/06/13 11:33, William Cohen wrote: >>> On 11/06/2013 10:57 AM, David Long wrote: >>>> On 11/06/13 10:24, William Cohen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi David, >>>>> >>>>> With the uprobe-v2 version I only saw one test that appeared to fail because of a sigsegv: >>>>> >>>> >>>> Are you testing on the same hardware? It's conceivable that could make a difference, especially if the number of CPU's is different. >>>> >>> >> >> I wouldn't expect those options to make a difference for uprobes. They might for kprobes. >> >> I just finally found the bug in ARM uretprobe's. It's a simple fix. >> >> -dl >> > > Hi Dave, > > Are there updated ARM uprobe-v3 patches somewhere? I would be happy to try them. out. > > -Will > Almost. Should be ready this weekend. -dl