Re: Results for arm uprobes-v3 posted

[William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>]

On 11/27/2013 11:26 AM, David Long wrote:
> On 11/27/13 11:23, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 04:06 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 12:25 AM, David Long wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I just now pushed V3 of the uprobes changes to my repo on the linaro website:
>>>>
>>>> git://git.linaro.org/people/davelong/linux.git
>>>>
>>>> It's the uprobes-v3 branch.  It's now based on V3.13-RC1.  You need at least that recent a kernel as Oleg has pushed some uprobes changes of his and mine that these patches depend on.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -dl
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the revised version of the patches.
>>>
>>> I built a version of uprobes-v3 kernel on the Samsung ARM cromebook.  It booted successfully and is running the systemtap "make installcheck".
>>>
>>> -Will
> 
> Are these more failures than were found with the v2 patches?
> 
> -dl
> 
> 

Hi Dave,

Here is the comparison between an earlier systemtap "make installcheck" with the older set of patches: https://web.elastic.org/~dejazilla/viewrgdiff.php?rg1=903451&rg2=893427&_sort=0A&_limit=1000

The at_var_cu.exp, global var-m32, global var-m32-O process_by_cmd2.stp appear to be regressions.

-Will