public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	systemtap@sourceware.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v4 0/6] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and fixes crash bugs
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A16D49.9050105@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b37P1ejFn4YJekJFOCe701mLTprqQi4KSyGV4S7QiVaC1=qA@mail.gmail.com>

(2013/12/05 22:08), Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
>> OK, I think the kprobe is like a strong medicine, not a toy,
>> since it can intercept most of the kernel functions which
>> may process a sensitive user private data. Thus even if we
>> fix all bugs and make it safe, I don't think we can open
>> it for all users (of course, there should be a knob to open
>> for any or restricted users.)
>>
>>> So we need both a maintainable and a sane/safe solution, and I'd like
>>> to apply the whole thing at once and be at ease that the solution is
>>> round. We should have done this years ago.
>>
>> For the safeness of kprobes, I have an idea; introduce a whitelist
>> for dynamic events. AFAICS, the biggest unstable issue of kprobes
>> comes from putting *many* probes on the functions called from tracers.
>>
>> It doesn't crash the kernel but slows down so much, because every
>> probes hit many other nested miss-hit probes. This gives us a big
>> performance impact. However, on the other side, this kind of feature
>> can be used *for debugging* static trace events by dynamic one if we
>> carefully use a small number of probes on such functions. :)
>>
>> Thus, I think we can restrict users from probing such functions by
>> using a whitelist which ftrace does already have;
>>  available_filter_functions :)
> I am not sure if this question is related, uprobes or ftrace code does
> not  define __kprobes, so is it safe to place kprobe on uprobes or
> ftrace code? 

Yes, it is "safe" in qualitative meaning. But for ftrace code, it could
give a performance impact by miss-hitting. Since uprobe is independent
from kprobe, it should work.

> Is it expected from arch code to support such cases?

Yes, the arch dependent implementation is the key. If it shares some
code which can be called from miss-hit path, it should be blacklisted.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-06  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04  1:34 Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:34 ` [PATCH -tip v4 1/6] kprobes: Prohibit probing on .entry.text code Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:35 ` [PATCH -tip v4 2/6] kprobes: Introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for blacklist Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:36 ` [PATCH -tip v4 4/6] [BUGFIX] x86: Prohibit probing on native_set_debugreg Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:36 ` [PATCH -tip v4 5/6] [BUGFIX] x86: Prohibit probing on thunk functions and restore Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:36 ` [PATCH -tip v4 6/6] [RFC] kprobes/x86: Call exception handlers directly from do_int3/do_debug Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  2:39   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11 13:31     ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-12  4:40       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-12  9:59         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-12 10:31           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:36 ` [PATCH -tip v4 3/6] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Prohibit probing on debug_stack_* Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  2:54 ` [PATCH -tip v4 0/6] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and fixes crash bugs Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-04  7:39   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  8:46     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-04 23:32       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 23:28   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-05 10:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-06  2:34       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-10 15:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-11  2:12           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-11 13:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-12  6:02               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-12 14:03                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-12 20:42                   ` Josh Stone
2013-12-13  5:34                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-13  6:06                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-16 10:53                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-05 13:08     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-06  6:23       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2013-12-06  6:54         ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-06 23:26           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-05 14:49     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2013-12-06  6:13       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-06 19:08         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2013-12-06 23:19           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-07  1:33             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2013-12-07  2:35               ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52A16D49.9050105@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).