From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <systemtap-return-23697-listarch-systemtap=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 130019 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2015 11:45:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <systemtap.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:systemtap-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:systemtap@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:systemtap-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 128788 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2015 11:45:03 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f169.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:44:59 +0000
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so28471535wib.0        for <systemtap@sourceware.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to         :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type         :content-transfer-encoding;        bh=zs0Ag2mK7k7M3KlwcxY07vNClzhdb6Fd4ZLM5BliZ8A=;        b=ekS90GP0dsTpSVVM3VYoGX8mMF4US83t1WVq1LUIk9yZYA5ovh1LB8uOdF1LeAm7Oh         X1W4cTmj7UmoonWl/gVP1kfmVE5+ivgNKVedn9EaxmtljfaNE9HDumWVIGbI8yBKSOuR         XGIcACLFHrS3bLe9uzrrpzwfjkcK5YHaWEIYacZ9izDDpNG47qP5cbCICMWSHQKI4STk         Nfw5IheRkUd7UVhS6ezBemWy1kEzXbf6GSur8xLRiGIYB7QTh55VtsaLP2VQq9sPbtfS         ljN8IG/0OBIU3KrEnQ0h1amPmKQC1yTXAgDV/KatBpHzeorXjpFYVnoT4+yZpJu3VvH4         d3Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVuLNn9DePOFqr+9aJG1kdczwcX+OAjDrwAGT3qYX5kLIc5q9msRozIgijtGzIj/8yT2OJ
X-Received: by 10.180.219.41 with SMTP id pl9mr5629201wic.30.1438343096115;        Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([90.152.119.35])        by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fs8sm6812462wjb.7.2015.07.31.04.44.54        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);        Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55BB5FB6.6060503@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:45:00 -0000
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
CC: systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Array handling question
References: <55AD3A9F.4030703@linaro.org> <y0msi8hk2q8.fsf@fche.csb>
In-Reply-To: <y0msi8hk2q8.fsf@fche.csb>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2015-q3/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2

Many thanks guys, I was able to sort it out!
Though I'm not on the list, but Google pointed me in the end to Josh's 
reply in the archives :)
Yes, I've mixed up stats with arrays in my mind, that was the root of 
the problems.

Regards,

Zoltan

On 21/07/15 15:24, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> zoltan.kiss wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> global cnt = 0;
>> [...]
>> global runtimes;
>> probe process(<procname>).function(<funcname>).return {
>> [...]
>> 	runtimes <<< runtime;
>> 	if (cnt > 50000) {
>> 		[...]
>> 		delete runtimes;
>> 	}
>> 	cnt++;
>> }
>
> By the way, a more canonical way to count would be to drop the extra
> "cnt" variable and use @count(runtimes) as the value to compare with 50000.
>
>
> - FChE
>