From: Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com>
To: Jon VanAlten <jvanalte@redhat.com>
Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net,
Lukas Berk <lberk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561523661.6232111.1351170539693.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480767885.1600415.1351141329748.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lukas Berk" <lberk@redhat.com>
> > To: "Jon VanAlten" <jvanalte@redhat.com>
> > Cc: systemtap@sourceware.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:53:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > * Jon VanAlten <jvanalte@redhat.com> [2012-09-24 14:16]:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Is this ok to commit?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > With caveats noted above, I say yes :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! Please let me know if there is anything else you'd like
> > > > to
> > > > know,
> > > > updated patch is attached.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This has been in my TODO for some time, so I am very sorry not to
> > > have responded earlier. From looking at the patch, it seems okay
> > > now. I intend to push this to HEAD on your behalf, unless
> > > someone
> > > else has some reason why not. (Now is your chance to speak up
> > > about that, if you have such a reason!). But, I do feel
> > > responsible
> > > to build with it myself and verify that things seem to be working
> > > as
> > > intended. Various other things have been jumping my work queue,
> > > but
> > > I may have time this week to give this a sanity check and finally
> > > get it into hg. Thanks for persisting!
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Jon
> >
> > I've updated the patch slightly to reflect a correction in
> > psScavenge.cpp that was causing a build error when icedtea-debug
> > wasn't
> > specified. The rest of the patch is unchanged from before.
> >
>
> And I've now pushed this. I know it's preferred that new work
> goes to forest in general, but this was discussed earlier when
> patch was originally posted, and afaict the feeling was it
> would be better to move all systemtap related patches there in
> one step some time later[1].
>
> Thanks Lukas for this contribution!
>
Why has this been pushed? We don't want more patches adding to IcedTea7.
Please revert.
> cheers,
> jon
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2012-August/020066.html
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-02 13:11 Lukas Berk
2012-08-03 13:56 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-08-03 14:23 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-07 11:50 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-08-08 14:01 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-08 14:34 ` Mario Torre
2012-08-08 20:37 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-08 21:11 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-08 22:05 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-22 20:34 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-24 19:59 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-28 21:23 ` Lukas Berk
2012-08-29 11:52 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-08-30 1:19 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-08-31 20:07 ` Lukas Berk
2012-09-24 18:17 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-10-23 16:53 ` Lukas Berk
2012-10-25 5:02 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-10-25 13:09 ` Andrew Hughes [this message]
2012-10-30 1:49 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-10-30 8:03 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-10-30 12:37 ` Andrew Hughes
2012-11-01 18:33 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-11-01 19:06 ` Mark Wielaard
2012-11-01 22:12 ` Jon VanAlten
2012-11-02 14:54 ` Andrew Hughes
2012-11-02 15:03 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561523661.6232111.1351170539693.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=gnu.andrew@redhat.com \
--cc=distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net \
--cc=jvanalte@redhat.com \
--cc=lberk@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).