From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126234 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2015 09:18:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact systemtap-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 126210 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2015 09:18:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: heian.cn.fujitsu.com Received: from cn.fujitsu.com (HELO heian.cn.fujitsu.com) (59.151.112.132) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:17:59 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO edo.cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2015 17:17:43 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edo.cn.fujitsu.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id tAG9HCl4020349; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:17:12 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.226.48) by G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:17:53 +0800 Message-ID: <56499EFB.9010704@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:18:00 -0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ilpob3UsIFdlbmppYW4v5ZGo5paH5YmRIg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] add case for probe timer References: <1447406704-14585-1-git-send-email-zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-q4/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On 11/13/2015 10:26 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Zhou Wenjian writes: > >> * testsuite/semko/timer_hz_randomize.stp: New test case >> [...] > > Thanks for this and the other test cases in this batch. I wonder how > you chose these particular areas, and what extra coverage they > provide. (Tests that are highly redundant with the rest of the > testsuite are not that valuable.) > > - FChE > I have reviewed the cases in this batch but can't figure out why they are redundant. Could you tell me more about that? I will be very appreciated and I can also take it into consideration when dealing with the following cases. -- Thanks Zhou